|
Request for clarification on comments re: VoiceXML 2.1: msg#00028web.voice
Hi, Janina, Thank you for your comments [1] regarding VoiceXML 2.1. In order for the VBWG to discuss and address these comments, however, we are in need of further clarification from you on the following: First, please expand on how the security mechanism specified in Appendix E of VoiceXML 2.1 would negatively impact accessibility. Second, please elaborate on the architecture in which a third-party trust broker would effectively provide authenticated access to data. Examples and scenarios are greatly appreciated. Matt Oshry Chief Editor, VoiceXML 2.1 [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-voice/2004JulSep/0058.html |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | IRIs, URIs, and RFC 2396bis: 00028, Anjels Green |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | FW:XHTML validator - possible bug: 00028, Ben Fortun |
| Previous by Thread: | IRIs, URIs, and RFC 2396bisi: 00028, Anjels Green |
| Next by Thread: | FW:XHTML validator - possible bug: 00028, Ben Fortun |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |