|
Re: Questions about CCXML and CCXML interpreter: msg#00015web.voice
The choice of a Free Software [0] (as opposed to "Open Source")license is a highly political matter. The main question you'll have to answer to is whether you want derivative works to be distributed under the same terms (ie. distributed as Free Software) or not (ie. one may modify your program and redistribute it under a proprietary license, closed-source, etc.). If you do want derivative works to be distributed under the same terms, then you may consider the GNU GPL [1]. If you don't, then there is the LGPL [2]. One important thing is to choose a widely spread license (the GNU licenses are the most widely used Free Software licenses so far, although BSD-like licenses are also often used). Choosing one such license will allow you to eventually incorporate other people's code released under that license. On the other hand, it will also make it easier for Free Software developers to use your code into their project. You may also want to look at the Free Software Foundation's license list: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html . [0] http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html [1] http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/gpl.html [2] http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/lgpl.html Ségolène Werner Dittmann wrote: All, |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Url Address To Be Verified 2 Sept. 2004: 00015, burst bum |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Questions about CCXML and CCXML interpreter: 00015, Robert Stewart |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: Questions about CCXML and CCXML interpreteri: 00015, Ken Rehor |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Questions about CCXML and CCXML interpreter: 00015, Robert Stewart |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |