|
Last Call comments: msg#00062web.svg
On 29 Mar 2005, at 05:13, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: * Dean Jackson wrote: I might be reading your sentence wrong. The plan is to release another draft within the Last Call (for both Tiny and Full). My reading of the W3C Process is that we must formally address the comments when advancing stages (to Call for Implementations), not when we release another draft at the same stage. It's as if we are extending the deadline of our existing Last Call. This isn't to say that we won't address the comments. That is clearly required. Dean |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: SVG12: Ogg media type: 00062, Dean Jackson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Last Call comments: 00062, Bjoern Hoehrmann |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: SVG12: Ogg media typei: 00062, Dean Jackson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Last Call comments: 00062, Bjoern Hoehrmann |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |