|
Are you already getting good results with Selenium?s command set? : msg#00076web.selenium.user
With the variety of commands Selenium offers, I?m surprised at the requests for things Selenium won?t do. (Please don?t confuse my surprise with accusations, as happened with a previous message. I appreciate everyones? contribution and am accusing no one of anything.) I?m wondering, how much web code is outside the norm, requiring special testing. Many things should be tested simply by Selenium. Objects calling scripts can be annoying. If we if we put all our code in custom tags, as some standards suggest for security and testing, scripts don?t have to be a problem. Are you using Selenium rich test command set and finding deficiencies or do you become obsessed with what Selenium won?t do? I have a tendency to the latter. Are all Selenium changes driven by real needs? Or are shops developing queer code that should be trashed? Poking around, I see a few troubling problems with frames and windows but lots of things that will work. New to Selenium, I more often see too many choices and have to decide which I should use. Clearly, when should I click, open, fireEvent, close, goBack, etc? Are you already getting good results with Selenium?s command set? __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005 http://mail.yahoo.com |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: letting Selenium do what it wants (was: user.js for firefox): 00076, paul cannon |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Select and Close "PDF" Popup Window: 00076, Jamie Orchard-Hays |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: letting Selenium do what it wants (was: user.js for firefox)i: 00076, paul cannon |
| Next by Thread: | Re: letting Selenium do what it wants (was: user.js for firefox): 00076, vernon viles |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |