|
[Pound Mailing List] Backends over Unix domain socket: msg#00030web.pound.general
Hi, It doesn't appear possible now, but is there some technical limitation that would prevent pound from connecting to backends over a local domain socket rather than a TCP port (provided pound and backend reside on same system, of course)? There would seem to be some benefits to do doing so (correct me if I'm wrong on any or all): 1) performance 2) reduced resource consumption (in terms of ports) 3) simplified permissions (file permissions to restrict access vs using something like selinux to secure ports) If this idea isn't out in left field, where would I make a feature request? Regards, Cliff -- -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject 'unsubscribe' to pound-Ws3YcLWMCpvhvxM+mQhndA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Please contact roseg-Ws3YcLWMCps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions. http://www.apsis.ch/pound/pound_list/archive/2006/2006-05/1147730586000 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | [Pound Mailing List] pound 2.0.5 config file syntax: 00030, Michael Kaplan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Pound Mailing List] Backends over Unix domain socket: 00030, Robert Segall |
| Previous by Thread: | [Pound Mailing List] pound 2.0.5 config file syntaxi: 00030, Michael Kaplan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Pound Mailing List] Backends over Unix domain socket: 00030, Robert Segall |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |