|
Re: [Pound Mailing List] FreeBSD and failed requests: msg#00010web.pound.general
More fuel for the fire. I took another spare machine, loaded up CentOS, and installed 2.0.4 then used the same configuration as I've been using on the FreeBSD Pound server. The good news is that it gave me the exact same performance, topping out around 400 requests per second, and giving the failed connections when using round-robin to two backends without IP sessions enabled. That's also the bad news. Clearly I'm doing something wrong here. -- Scott Larson Network Administrator IOWA Interactive 4212 Glencoe Ave Marina Del Rey, CA 90292 t 310.823.8238 f 310.823.7108 stl-vBUKIvN/9hiGO4FRh9xBPkEOCMrvLtNR@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.iowainteractive.com http://www.wiredrive.com -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject 'unsubscribe' to pound-Ws3YcLWMCpvhvxM+mQhndA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Please contact roseg-Ws3YcLWMCps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions. http://www.apsis.ch/pound/pound_list/archive/2006/2006-05/1146767005000/1146875049000 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Pound Mailing List] FreeBSD and failed requests: 00010, Scott Larson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Pound Mailing List] FreeBSD and failed requests: 00010, Robert Segall |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Pound Mailing List] FreeBSD and failed requestsi: 00010, Scott Larson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Pound Mailing List] FreeBSD and failed requests: 00010, Robert Segall |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | Mail Home | sitemap | FAQ | advertise |