|
Re: [Pound Mailing List] FreeBSD and failed requests: msg#00005web.pound.general
You say something about being out of ports with 1.9. That seems impossible if you are sending 50 requests with no request concurrency. What do the server logs say when you are using pound? Also, what kind of transactions are these? Is there a possibility that pound is rejecting many of them as ill-formed? Scott Larson wrote: A rather strange problem I'm having. Searching through the archives I see this exact question was asked back in February but got no responses. The issue is that the throughput by a server running Pound falls flat, and generates failed requests on the magnitude of 70-80% by Apache bench, even when performing a request as small as 50 with 1 concurrent user. If I bypass Pound and direct the requests straight to the back end web server, failed requests drop to zero. Necessary background info would be that the OS is FreeBSD 6.1-RC2, that I get this problem with pound 1.9 out of ports, and that it persists even with 2.0.4 built against a separate OpenSSL with threading enabled. Since I'd prefer to use 2.x, here's the current config: -- Ted Dunning Chief Scientist Veoh Networks -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject 'unsubscribe' to pound-Ws3YcLWMCpvhvxM+mQhndA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Please contact roseg-Ws3YcLWMCps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions. http://www.apsis.ch/pound/pound_list/archive/2006/2006-05/1146767005000/1146768313000 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | [Pound Mailing List] FreeBSD and failed requests: 00005, Scott Larson |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Pound Mailing List] FreeBSD and failed requests: 00005, Scott Larson |
| Previous by Thread: | [Pound Mailing List] FreeBSD and failed requestsi: 00005, Scott Larson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Pound Mailing List] FreeBSD and failed requests: 00005, Scott Larson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |