|
Re: [Pound Mailing List] Choice of syslog facility for 2.0.4: msg#00001web.pound.general
Will Tatam said the following on 05/02/06 13:15: > My logging to syslog was happily running when compiled with > "--with-log=LOG_LOCAL6" when running 1.9 however when i try and compile > 2.0.4 it appears to be ignoring the log facility as the logs are not > appearing in the correct file that syslog creates > > How do I define the facility for pound 2.0.X ? > In the config (See man pound) LogFacility local6 much better this way, so you don't have to have multiple binary versions of pound for different log facilities. Russell Valentine -- To unsubscribe send an email with subject 'unsubscribe' to pound-Ws3YcLWMCpvhvxM+mQhndA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Please contact roseg-Ws3YcLWMCps@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for questions. http://www.apsis.ch/pound/pound_list/archive/2006/2006-05/1146593730000/1146624790000 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | [Pound Mailing List] Choice of syslog facility for 2.0.4: 00001, Will Tatam |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Pound Mailing List] Performance problems with debian sarge version of pound (1.8.2): 00001, Bernhard Grün |
| Previous by Thread: | [Pound Mailing List] Choice of syslog facility for 2.0.4i: 00001, Will Tatam |
| Next by Thread: | [Pound Mailing List] Performance problems with debian sarge version of pound (1.8.2): 00001, Bernhard Grün |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |