Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
>
> A "real" reporting tool based on the phpOpenTracker API would work quite
> different from this example application.
What kind of differences would it have? I can see some simple things
like letting the user decide the time range and which report to generate
instead of generating the whole lot of them. But other than that I can
see of the top of my head how else a 'real' reporting tool based on
phpOpenTracker would be different.
Also do you have any data on how well POT scales? I.e. could it be used
for a site that as, for example, >100,000 document requests being logged
per day?
I have been using analog for large apache log files ( > 10 GB) but I
can't see phpOpenTracker being useable on a high traffic site like mine
which generates daily log files of 1GB ...
I hope I am wrong because I would really like to use POT to track that
site :)
Jean-Christian Imbeault
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
|
