|
Re: what has to be is stored on a consumer-app ?: msg#00111web.openid.general
On Thu, 2006-02-16 at 18:33 +0100, zwiskle wrote: > Think on this scenario: > > I am A.livejournal.com > Now I create on my other homepage ( e.com ) a "e.com/a" and place there > a reference ( <link... or Yadis ) to a.livejournal.com . > Writing now e.g. some bad comments. > Then I _delete_ the "e.com/a" ( breaking the reference-chain ). Yup. OpenID, by itself, does not provide much in the way of accountability. The fact that someone has signed in with OpenID does not make them trustworthy. Nor does that the fact that you have an OpenID recorded for them mean you can do much with it if you have a problem with that account. Your example here uses delegation (creating a homepage on e.com that points to a.livejournal.com), but the issues are the same even without that, using your server's ID directly. It's really really cheap to set up a new OpenID server on a new domain. Having a consumer store both the identity URL and the server it authenticates against adds a little to your audit trail, but that doesn't buy you very much in most applications. What OpenID *does* do is give us groundwork on which we can build some systems that do have accountability. With this identifier that can be authenticated in a consistent way across many sites, they can start to say "yes, I know e.com/a is not likely to be a spammer because the alphabet.foo community trusts him", or "e.com/a spammed my site so I will publish a black mark on his reputation, which will either discourage him from doing that or force him to abandon that identity." But we haven't built those systems yet. There's more work to do. Which means we better get back to codin'. - Kevin (although plenty of people are working in this space right now. Some discussions, picked at a whim from the many that have floated across my desktop recently, include http://recentchangescamp.org/SpamAndWhitelistsNotes and http://www.clipperz.net/users/marco/blog/2006/02/04/reputation_for_blog_comments_a_revision_to_our_proposal ) -- http://www.openidenabled.com/ |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | what has to be is stored on a consumer-app ?: 00111, zwiskle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: YADIS in one sentence: 00111, Johannes Ernst |
| Previous by Thread: | what has to be is stored on a consumer-app ?i: 00111, zwiskle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: what has to be is stored on a consumer-app ?: 00111, Daniel E. Renfer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |