Re: Broken HTML Support

On Feb 11, 2006, at 9:33 PM, Johannes Ernst wrote:
> Reasonable implementation guidelines (non-normative) might be:
>
> 1) if broken HTML is displayed as something reasonable in a  
> reasonably standard browser, a user will expect that any identity  
> markup in this page will be similarly understood by a YADIS  
> implementation, just like the broken HTML is understood by the  
> browser.
>
> 2) if the YADIS implementation cannot make sense out of the  
> (broken) HTML, it displays a reasonable error message that  
> indicates that.

After a glance at the wiki, I think all these things belong in the  
Implementor's Guide, which I guess is just an informative spec.
Should we just start writing it, and move all discussion on there? Or  
wait till consensus before we create it?

Joseph Anthony Pasquale Holsten
24R E 24th St Tulsa OK 74114-2406
mailto:pantosys@xxxxxxxxx
xmpp:pantosys@xxxxxxxxx
tel:+1* 918 813 2447

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature