|
Re: subroutines: msg#00259web.mason.user
On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Drew Johnston wrote: > The whole subroutine thing bothers... why do they have shared namespace but > not shared scope? > Also it is kind of bothering to have to worry about the order you defined > anonymous subroutines. surely this is kind of 'funky'. > anyone wish to comment? My comment is put your subroutines in modules, where they belong, not directly in your Mason components. -dave /*======================= House Absolute Consulting www.houseabsolute.com =======================*/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Stylesheets for the error display?: 00259, Pascal Eeftinck |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Stylesheets for the error display?: 00259, Jonathan Swartz |
| Previous by Thread: | subroutinesi: 00259, Drew Johnston |
| Next by Thread: | Re: subroutines: 00259, Dave Rolsky |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |