|
RE: A "catch-all" component?: msg#00155web.mason.user
> % $m->subexec( '/languages/show_news', ... ); > > it will do dhandler lookup and so on. That's the point of subrequests. > > The only difference between this and what you're proposing is that you > have to explicitly use a subrequest instead of a normal component call. OK, but how do I capture a subrequest's output, like I do with scomp ? Egor. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by Dice.com. Did you know that Dice has over 25,000 tech jobs available today? From careers in IT to Engineering to Tech Sales, Dice has tech jobs from the best hiring companies. http://www.dice.com/index.epl?rel_code=104 |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | RE: A "catch-all" component?: 00155, Marc Logghe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: A "catch-all" component?: 00155, Marc Logghe |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: A "catch-all" component?i: 00155, Dave Rolsky |
| Next by Thread: | Re: A "catch-all" component?: 00155, Jonathan Swartz |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |