|
Re: [Flickr APIs] new authentication api: msg#00056web.flickr.api
On 25/8/04 7:43 pm, Cal Henderson wrote: > does that make any sense? Okay makes perfect sense, I realise now that you'd store a hash of all three values, thus the return URL mask cannot be other than what the user originally authorised. I do think it's good (secure) that the user chooses which sites to authorise, but as Peter said, they must be aware of what/where they're authorising. // Jacob |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Flickr APIs] new authentication api: 00056, Peter Lindberg |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Flickr APIs] url for images: 00056, Forrest Oliphant |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Flickr APIs] new authentication apii: 00056, Peter Lindberg |
| Next by Thread: | [Flickr APIs] flickr.people Search by name?: 00056, Paul M. Watson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |