|
Re: new API Ref up: msg#00497web.dojo.devel
Yeah, and my plan for that ticket was to impelement the ability to document externally, and then close that ticket as wontfix FYI, just because a feature request is there doesn't mean it's a good one. -Neil > Owen Williams wrote: >> Alternatively, we could define an "example" keyword, like the >> summary/description/etc keywords, which would be treated just like the >> "src" block. It's not as flexible, but would be easy to do. Separating >> out the examples from the summary would be nice from a visual standpoint >> when the API viewer is in "summary" mode. > > Just FYI, there's a trac ticket for that feature request: > http://trac.dojotoolkit.org/ticket/1473 > > > >> On Oct 29, 2006, at 11:10 PM, Alex Russell wrote: >>> Is there some way to get some block of formatting preserved from the >>> source comments. In particular, the docs for dojo.event.connect are >>> pretty badly mangled and I'd like to know how to "pass through" some >>> amount of formatting. >>> >>> Regards > _______________________________________________ > dojo-contributors mailing list > dojo-contributors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://dojotoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/dojo-contributors > |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: new API Ref up: 00497, Dylan Schiemann |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: new API Ref up: 00497, Neil Roberts |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: new API Ref upi: 00497, Brian Douglas Skinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: new API Ref up: 00497, Neil Roberts |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |