Jesse Kuhnert wrote:
P.S. Sorry for hijacking your thread, but I'm not sure you'll ever truly
be rid of it as long as we keep throwing the wrong terminology around.
If we're going to present ourselves as javascript experts we should at
least have enough respect for the language to use the correct terms..
So, I'm open to using any terms. My suggestion (to Jesse, Tom, etc.) is
that instead of having so many emails about the topic, just make a
proposal of the words you think are good, and then we can vote on it.
Just be sure to list all the concepts in your proposal (ie, if we say
"constructor" instead of "class", then what do we say instead of
"superclass", "subclass", "extend", "override", "protected", "public",
and "private"? Really, anything is OK with me, but I need words similar
to the words above in order to be able to write about the widgets.)
