Re: documenting widgets was: release 0.4.1 bug triage

Bill Keese wrote:
> Probably the main difference between the lists is that the API doc 
> contains a lot of internal widgets.  I think if you wait until the API 
> doc for the widgets is done it'll be clear which widgets are meant to 
> be used explicitly ussed and which are used internally.
Any idea when the API doc for widgets will be done?
> Right, this is what I was aiming for w/the chapter on Forms and the 
> chapter on Layout widgets, although the chapter on forms actually 
> encompasses everything related to forms, not just widgets.
I think this makes sense especially from the users point of view and it 
makes the list more manageable.
> The other thing (I'm sure the nomenclature police will take great 
> offense to me saying this) is that a single "widget" (from the user's 
> point of view), like the Tree, is actually composed of multiple 
> widgets (TreeV3, TreeV3Node, TreeV3Controller etc.)  This is a pattern 
> with many of the widgets, and should be evident from the fact that all 
> the related  widgets start w/the same word.
> _______________________________________________
> dojo-contributors mailing list
> dojo-contributors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://dojotoolkit.org/mailman/listinfo/dojo-contributors