> It is an interesting concept, but that document is technically
> invalid because xhtml has no 'cow' element. It would need to be
> served with an appropriate xml doctype (or no doctype at all) to be
> technically correct.
>
> Roger,
Whoops! Nice catch, Roger. Unfortunately, dreamweaver automatically throws
the doctype in there for me. It's fixed now. :) Thanks!
Jough
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [css-d-FPEHb7Xf0XVf4fvhJAioeSCwEArCW2h5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
|
