logo       

RE: Text-decoration in :after content: msg#01288

Subject: RE: Text-decoration in :after content
At 16:24 -0700 9/29/02, Moira Burke wrote:

 >a !img { /* stuff */ }
 >isn't valid CSS, so it shouldn't have done
 >anything.  How did it work, and in which browser?

You know, I just tried the !img on a whim, and it worked in IE5.5,
Netscape 6 and 7 (all Win).  The styles were applied to all of my linked
text but left the linked images untouched.

I need to see your test page so I can understand what's going on. Feel free to e-mail it to me directly or share it here. I'd like to see if this really is supported by browsers in any way besides the negative.

Thanks for the a.imgonly idea.

   No problem.

--
Eric A. Meyer (http://www.meyerweb.com/eric/), List Chaperone
"CSS is much too interesting and elegant to be not taken seriously."
  -- Martina Kosloff (http://www.mako4css.com/)
_______________________________________________
css-discuss [css-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxx]
http://three.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/css-discuss
Sponsored by www.westciv.com - CSS resources | software | learning



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>