logo       

Re: Typepad acquisition and memcached?: msg#00010

web.cache.memcached

Subject: Re: Typepad acquisition and memcached?

Brad Fitzpatrick wrote:
> Yes, memcached is still BSD-licensed. Could could it not be? You can't
> un-open-source something.

Hi Brad,

I'd like to file ITP (intent to package) announcements for packaging
Perlbal, MogileFS, and Fotobilder for Debian. To do so, I need to
specify their license.

Are perlbal, mogilefs, and fotobilder governed by the BSD license as
well?

Thanks!

Kevin

> can even ship it in their closed products with unreleased modifications
> if they wanted. I don't see why they would, but they /could/ legally.
>
> And I don't see any strategic advantage to holding back caching from the
> world... anybody can cache. We'd prefer people use ours than somebody
> elses, then we get improvements from people using ours.
>
> So yes, I believe development will continue, and we'll continue to BSD
> license our changes.
>
> - Brad
>
--
Kevin Rosenberg
kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise