|
Re: Typepad acquisition and memcached?: msg#00010web.cache.memcached
Brad Fitzpatrick wrote: > Yes, memcached is still BSD-licensed. Could could it not be? You can't > un-open-source something. Hi Brad, I'd like to file ITP (intent to package) announcements for packaging Perlbal, MogileFS, and Fotobilder for Debian. To do so, I need to specify their license. Are perlbal, mogilefs, and fotobilder governed by the BSD license as well? Thanks! Kevin > can even ship it in their closed products with unreleased modifications > if they wanted. I don't see why they would, but they /could/ legally. > > And I don't see any strategic advantage to holding back caching from the > world... anybody can cache. We'd prefer people use ours than somebody > elses, then we get improvements from people using ours. > > So yes, I believe development will continue, and we'll continue to BSD > license our changes. > > - Brad > -- Kevin Rosenberg kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: Typepad acquisition and memcached?: 00010, Brad Fitzpatrick |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | memcache(3) 1.2.0 released...: 00010, Sean Chittenden |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Typepad acquisition and memcached?i: 00010, Brad Fitzpatrick |
| Next by Thread: | memcache API happiness for C and Ruby users...: 00010, Sean Chittenden |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |