Re: Not valid, but no errors?

On Sat, 2004-08-28 at 13:48, Hacksaw wrote:
> I went back and looked at the message I sent, and the URI is the first line 
> of 
> the message. Are you saying it's not there in what went out to the list?

Correct.

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2004Aug/0229.html

I've just taken a closer look (to find the URI of the archived page) and
found it buried in the headers.

I don't know why the validator is behaving as it is, but your Doctype is
somewhat ... weird.

For a stand you are using:

  DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Strict//EN"

But you should be using:

  DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN"

Then you have the URL to the XHTML 1.0 Strict DTD instead of the HTML
4.01 Strict DTD.

http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/04/valid-dtd-list.html


-- 
David Dorward       <http://blog.dorward.me.uk/>   <http://dorward.me.uk/>
http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/04/valid-dtd-list.html