|
RE: OpenSER and Redundancy: msg#00547voip.openser.user
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andreas Granig > [mailto:andreas.granig-OgOzDlH/P96h6J55Ss3d3w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2006 9:05 AM > To: Douglas Garstang > Cc: martin.klisch-0BV18Q16miGpNJwnWTGRF3qWYbMAw+HU@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; > users-WLQjAxnOB31AfugRpC6u6w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [Users] OpenSER and Redundancy > > > Douglas Garstang wrote: > > We tried to use OpenSER in a redundant fashion (three > servers all pointing to the same database), but got > unexpected results. We gave up after posting questions to > this list multiple times and getting incomplete half answers > to our questions, about something that the 'documentation' > says is supported. > > We use such a setup (with a MySQL cluster as DB backend and cacheless > mode of usrloc) for months now without any problems. That's a neat treat, because I was told by the developers in this list that this mode of operation was not supported, which surprised me, because it contradicted the docs. |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: multiple domain best practices?: 00547, Mark Kent |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: OpenSER and Redundancy: 00547, Andreas Granig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: OpenSER and Redundancyi: 00547, Andreas Granig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: OpenSER and Redundancy: 00547, Andreas Granig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |