how to run openser through monit daemon?

Hi all!
I have installed openser through CVS from the following link
http://openser.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=install_and_maintain_openser_from_cvs

till the 8 th step in the link everything went well fine. in the 9 th step, 
there is a link to make oepnser.init script work and i did all the steps as 
described. I downloaded and installed the monit daemon to start openser thru 
it. however, now if i type /etc/init.d/openser start, it says command monit 
to start openser and then the command prompt appears back. i dont see the 
tcp and udp ports (5060 ) and other information etc when the openser is 
started.....and i cant figure out if it is running at all.....if i issue ps 
command, i dont see any pid for openser.....if i open the web interface of 
the monit daemon, i see that it is trying to start the openser but after 
some time it shows failed to start......

please let me know what to do asap.....
Thanks


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <users-request-WLQjAxnOB31AfugRpC6u6w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <users-WLQjAxnOB31AfugRpC6u6w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 3:30 PM
Subject: Users Digest, Vol 12, Issue 71


> Send Users mailing list submissions to
> users-WLQjAxnOB31AfugRpC6u6w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> users-request-WLQjAxnOB31AfugRpC6u6w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> users-owner-WLQjAxnOB31AfugRpC6u6w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: How to extract sip-id when using alias-id?
>      (Bogdan-Andrei Iancu)
>   2. Route Algorithm. (raviprakash sunkara)
>   3. Re: Forward SUBSCRIBER (Bogdan-Andrei Iancu)
>   4. RE: 2 Openser Instances (Sam Lee)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 12:35:21 +0300
> From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan-/qk4c3+6r1L0ABVSK+4LOw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Users] How to extract sip-id when using alias-id?
> To: Frogger <froggerandbongo-/E1597aS9LQAvxtiuMwx3w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: users-WLQjAxnOB31AfugRpC6u6w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <4476CBD9.80002-/qk4c3+6r1L0ABVSK+4LOw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
>
> Hi,
>
> what you can do is to save into an AVP the alias before doing
> lookup(aliases). In failure route, before sending to voicemail, push the
> AVP into RURI to have the alias and not the sip id.
>
> regards,
> bogdan
>
> Frogger wrote:
>
> > Good point.
> > I need to clarify...
> >
> > The alias is working to route to the user however if
> > the timer expires, the route fails or if there is a
> > reject, the failure routes are applying their logic to
> > the alias-id not the sip-id.
> >
> > What I need to do is apply the failure route logic to
> > the sip-id so we can send the attempt to voicemail.
> >
> > Let say I have an alias of 1000-9dM3hzoSjHY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for sip-id
> > 5551212-RsIHbiFnPJY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > When 1000-9dM3hzoSjHY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx is dialed by another user in the
> > domain (I am using "use_domain") the call is properly
> > routed to:  5551212-RsIHbiFnPJY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > However, if 5551212-9dM3hzoSjHY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx does not answer, timer
> > expires, or a reject, then the failure logic is be
> > applied to the alias.
> >
> > Failure route says:
> >
> > prefix("66");
> > append_branch();
> > append_urihf("CC-Diversion: ", "\r\n");
> > t_relay();
> >
> >
> > Result of the failure logic:
> >
> > 661000-9dM3hzoSjHY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Needs to be:
> >
> > 665551212-9dM3hzoSjHY@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > F
> >
> >
> > --- Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan-/qk4c3+6r1L0ABVSK+4LOw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > not sure I understand - you dial an alias and via
> > > db_aliases you replace
> > > the alias with the sip-id. So you have the sip-id ..
> > > where is the problem?
> > >
> > > regards,
> > > bogdan
> > >
> > > Frogger wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > I am using alias_db to store alias's for users.
> > > >
> > > > However when an alias is dialed I need to also be
> > > able
> > >
> > >
> > > > to restore the alias owners original sip-id.
> > > >
> > > > This is necessary to forward the call to voicemail
> > > > using sip-id.
> > > >
> > > > Any guidance on getting the sip-id out of the
> > > alias_db
> > >
> > >
> > > > and replacing the alias-id prior to forwarding to
> > > > vmail?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks in advance!
> > > >
> > > > F
> > > >
> > > > __________________________________________________
> > > > Do You Yahoo!?
> > > > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> > > protection around
> > >
> > >
> > > > http://mail.yahoo.com
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Users mailing list
> > > > Users-WLQjAxnOB31AfugRpC6u6w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 05:38:23 -0400
> From: "raviprakash sunkara" 
> <sunkara.raviprakash.feb14-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Users] Route Algorithm.
> To: Users-WLQjAxnOB31AfugRpC6u6w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Klaus Darilion"
> <klaus.mailinglists-JrFdhpDTk1BeoWH0uzbU5w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, 
> daniel-/qk4c3+6r1L0ABVSK+4LOw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
> nickm-FjbBnHP6h+bc+919tysfdA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID:
> <f0f0f9340605260238l2e6ce419qd109b6f97e57c485-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Hi listers and  Users.
>
> Please help me in " how to make a call from one place to other place in
> route algorithm "
>
>
> I got Call not approved ? what is this and also $04 and $08 messages as 
> not
> found and request timeout........
>
>
> It connect ( REgister) to server .
>
> server respond as 1 st  " 200 ok " and then " 408 request time out....
>
> plesse help me
>
> Bye..
> --
> Thanks and Regards with cheers
> Sunkara Ravi Prakash (Voip Developer)
> Hyperion Technology
> www.hyperion-tech.com
> <b>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> http://openser.org/pipermail/users/attachments/20060526/afad0b31/attachment.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 12:42:55 +0300
> From: Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bogdan-/qk4c3+6r1L0ABVSK+4LOw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [Users] Forward SUBSCRIBER
> To: Javier Ramirez <jvr_78-/E1597aS9LQMlKAeRRkD2Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: users-WLQjAxnOB31AfugRpC6u6w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID: <4476CD9F.4060808-/qk4c3+6r1L0ABVSK+4LOw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Hi,
>
> as I see you are trying to use the PA for presence - that's a different
> story. So, what do you want:
>
> 1) presence end-2-end directly between end-users
> 2) presence via PA - the users will talk only with the PA and not 
> directly.
>
> regards,
> bogdan
>
> Javier Ramirez wrote:
>
> > I read all documentation from internet, and nothing.
> >
> > please
> >
> >
> > if (method=="SUBSCRIBE") {
> >
> >        if (!t_newtran()) {
> >
> >            sl_reply_error();
> >
> >        };
> >
> >        handle_subscription("registrar");
> >
> >    # break;
> >
> > };
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > when I coment the "break;" the SUBSCRIBER message is forward to B user.
> >
> > if I don´t coment the break, the SUBSCRIBER end in OpenSER.
> >
> >
> >
> > why ?
> >
> >
> >
> > best Regards
> >
> > Javier
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Fri, 26 May 2006 17:45:44 +0800
> From: "Sam Lee" <sam.lee-0UkvhIHUJaWVdsZdvqBcNw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: [Users] 2 Openser Instances
> To: "Klaus Darilion" 
> <klaus.mailinglists-JrFdhpDTk1BeoWH0uzbU5w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: users-WLQjAxnOB31AfugRpC6u6w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Message-ID:
> <A0E9DBAAF59F2C49AB566EC7B3907872136A71-RyUldoKxd/hw7QLIISc4PHsb1rIjjFhEi72o2cXPg+0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I tried the cacheless mode, it didn't work for me.
>
> I'm just wondering , how did those people out there do their OUTBOUND
> proxy ?
> Can anyone give me some hint ?
>
> Regards,
> Sam
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Klaus Darilion 
> [mailto:klaus.mailinglists-JrFdhpDTk1BeoWH0uzbU5w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 4:57 PM
> To: Sam Lee
> Cc: users-WLQjAxnOB31AfugRpC6u6w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Users] 2 Openser Instances
>
> Sam Lee wrote:
> > Hi Klaus,
> >
> > Thanks for the quick reply. My purpose is one of the instance being a
> > normal Openser, the other with a FORCE RTPproxy. This is so that if
> > they have a symmetric NAT going on in their network, they can make use
>
> > of this rtpproxy as an outbound proxy but still able to call those
> > register with the normal openser.
> >
> > Care to explain what is cacheless userloc mode ? How do I set it ?
>
> http://openser.org/docs/modules/devel/usrloc.html#AEN252
>
> it's mode 3 (only available in CVS head)
> > Because of the normal and force RTPproxy , these 2 instances has
> > different routing patterns, and they are handled differently.
>
> I still would use only one proxy and apply NAT traversal only for
> clients which use the "NAT traversal" port on your openser.
>
> The idea is:
> ...
> if ( dst_port = 6060) { # needs NAT traversal
> if (is_method("REGISTER")) {
> setflag(9);
> # this is the natflag specified in userloc module #
> http://openser.org/docs/modules/1.0.x/registrar.html#AEN103
> fix_nated_register();
> } else {
> # do all the NAT traversal, activate RTP proxy
> }
> }
>
> # now do the normal call and REGISTER handling
>
> ...
>
>
>
>
>
> ...
> lookup("location");
> if(isflagset(9)) {
>    ...#force rtp proxy
> }
> ....
>
>
>
> regards
> klaus
>
>
>
> > Any ideas ?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sam
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Klaus Darilion 
> > [mailto:klaus.mailinglists-JrFdhpDTk1BeoWH0uzbU5w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Friday, May 26, 2006 4:28 PM
> > To: Sam Lee
> > Cc: users-WLQjAxnOB31AfugRpC6u6w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [Users] 2 Openser Instances
> >
> > 1. You can run several instances of openser on the same PC, but what
> > is your purpose?
> >
> > 2. If 2 openser proxies share the same userloc database, you have to
> > use the cacheless userloc mode
> >
> > 3. If you just want to listen on several ports, use a single proxy
> > with multiple listen directives
> >
> > listen=udp:1.2.3.4:5060
> > listen=udp:1.2.3.4:6060
> > listen=udp:1.2.3.4:7060
> >
> > regards
> > klaus
> >
> >
> > Sam Lee wrote:
> > > Have anyone tried running 2 separate instances on OpenSER (running on
>
> > > different ports) ?
> > > Both these instances are doing almost exactly the same thing, they
> > > take in REGISTER and save them into the locations database. They all
> > > do all the other processing like INVITE.
> > >
> > > Will this causes a problem in MYSQL ? I'm asking this because i got a
>
> > > very strange problem. I register 1 UA to each instances. When i did a
>
> > > ul show , it always only have either the UA from instance A or UA
> > > from
> >
> > > instance B . Note, these 2 UA have different numbers. Why can't it
> > > just save both into the MYSQL DB ?
> > >
> > > I would be glad to clarify any doubts. Please assist as far as you
> > can.
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Sam
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > -
> > > --
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Users mailing list
> > > Users-WLQjAxnOB31AfugRpC6u6w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users-WLQjAxnOB31AfugRpC6u6w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> End of Users Digest, Vol 12, Issue 71
> *************************************