|
Re: xine development process [was: xine and post plugin segfault.]: msg#00178video.xine.devel
Hi guenter, > > Uohm, well, maybe I understood Miguel wrong in the details, but > > it's still my opinion that too much branching causes too much > > confusion and we all seem to agree on that. > > definitely - actually this was the starting point of this discussion > ;) when it was proposed to create all sorts of experimental branches > for every new feature (that's what it sounded like to me). > > however, create small release branches for every release still seems > like a very good idea to me This is something I can easily agree with. Michael -- /* James M doesn't say fuck enough. */ 2.4.3 linux/net/core/netfilter.c ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: xine development process [was: xine and post plugin segfault.]: 00178, Guenter Bartsch |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | patch: PSX STR demux improvement + CDXA ADPCM: 00178, Stuart Caie |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xine development process [was: xine and post plugin segfault.]i: 00178, Guenter Bartsch |
| Next by Thread: | Re: xine development process [was: xine and post plugin segfault.]: 00178, Daniel Caujolle-Bert |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |