|
Re: "soft telecine": msg#00228video.ffmpeg.user
On Sat, Feb 18, 2006 at 08:24:14AM -0500, Arant, Wayne wrote: > Rich, I appreciate the answer, and what I'm asking is if it skips > fields when it is decoding, or if it keeps them in tact. It outputs exactly what is in the file, which is progressive frames. For the frames that were flagged to be displayed for 3 fields duration instead of 2, this is indicated in the structure returned. For frames that were flagged to start on the bottom field, this is also indicated. > The other part of the question is would it be better to specify a > lower framerate (could I tell it to ignore the flag, and just get > the origonal untelecined frames) Yes, this is what will naturally happen if you just consider the output as progressive frames at 24000/1001 fps and ignore the flags. > As far as the CRAP... I don't add it to my e-mail, It is added at my > gateway. If it is too annoying, I'll have to switch e-mail > acccounts. Well it's not _extremely_ annoying, but members of this community are generally pissed off by threatening extralegal legalese and nondisclosure demands. If your company insists on appending this crap to your emails, are you sure they even want you to be emailing public lists from your company email account? BTW, please don't top-post either. Rich |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Re: cant compile in osx: 00228, Laine Lee |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: "soft telecine": 00228, Wayne Arant |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: "soft telecine"i: 00228, Arant, Wayne |
| Next by Thread: | Re: "soft telecine": 00228, Wayne Arant |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |