|
Re: some questions of protocol: msg#00202video.blender.devel
Kent Mein wrote: A patch would be just fine.Hello, I'm trying to generate a patch with the following command: cvs diff -b -B -c > blender_ptyhon_armature.diff This seems to insert some cvs information that is not part of the patch like "? filename" at the beginning of it, and also it generates a lot of information overwriting the Makefiles. I think that it is due to the use of autotools to regenerate them, so i've made a make distclean but some Makefiles remain there. Actually, most of the patch is about the makefiles... The diff option -X="Makefile*" would avoid this, but "cvs diff" doesn't accept it. What should i do to generate a patch? Should i make a patch with diff and a fresh cvs checkout? Thanks in advance. Once i can supply a patch with my modifications, i'll also post a message explaining the python interface i'm using right now, to discuss and correct it. (bandoler) |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Fwd: missing libGL.so.14 file for install of blender 2.2.5 on freebsd 4.7: 00202, Ton Roosendaal |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: some questions of protocol: 00202, Kent Mein |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: some questions of protocoli: 00202, Kent Mein |
| Next by Thread: | Re: some questions of protocol: 00202, Kent Mein |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |