osdir.com
mailing list archive

Subject: Re: svk sync failed when meeting large patchset - msg#00063

List: version-control.svk.devel

Date: Prev Next Index Thread: Prev Next Index
On 26/11/06, Gea-Suan Lin <gslin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
svk sync will fail when trying to get large patchset:

$ svn diff -r 120:121 http://opensvn.csie.org/networkprogramming | wc -l
102911

$ svk mi http://opensvn.csie.org/networkprogramming
//mirror/opensvn/networkprogramming
$ svk sync //mirror/opensvn/networkprogramming

Does svk sync -t 121 help? Otherwise you might want to try svk
2.0beta1, as it uses the new svn sync api and should be more reliable.

Cheers,
CLK
_______________________________________________
svk-devel mailing list
svk-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/svk-devel



Was this page helpful?
Yes No
Thread at a glance:

Previous Message by Date: click to view message preview

svk sync failed when meeting large patchset

Hello, svk sync will fail when trying to get large patchset: $ svn diff -r 120:121 http://opensvn.csie.org/networkprogramming | wc -l 102911 $ svk mi http://opensvn.csie.org/networkprogramming //mirror/opensvn/networkprogramming $ svk sync //mirror/opensvn/networkprogramming [...] Committed revision 119 from revision 117. Committed revision 120 from revision 118. Committed revision 121 from revision 119. Committed revision 122 from revision 120. Unable to extract data from response header: Could not get content-type from response test on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p8 & 6.2-PRERELEASE. svk 1.08, svn 1.4.2. -- * Gea-Suan Lin (public key: Using https://keyserver.pgp.com/ to search) * If you cannot convince them, confuse them. -- Harry S Truman _______________________________________________ svk-devel mailing list svk-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/svk-devel

Next Message by Date: click to view message preview

Re: svk 2.0beta1 is released.

Does anyone have a Win32 build of svk 2.0 beta 1 available?  Definitely want to help test but don't have environment setup to build.On 11/25/06, Chia-Liang Kao <clkao@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi all, I'm pleased to announced the first beta of svk 2.0 is now on CPAN: file: $CPAN/authors/id/C/CL/CLKAO/SVK-1.99_04.tar.gz size: 405587 bytes  md5: 51a04e74d25798ccfa1b50fa762458e5It is also available from http://download.bestpractical.com/pub/svk/.Please help testing, as well as improving the test coverage byspotting important code paths that are not being exercised.  The current coverage run is at: http://fsck.com/~clkao/svk-cover/Cheers,CLK_______________________________________________svk-devel mailing list svk-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxhttp://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/svk-devel _______________________________________________ svk-devel mailing list svk-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/svk-devel

Previous Message by Thread: click to view message preview

svk sync failed when meeting large patchset

Hello, svk sync will fail when trying to get large patchset: $ svn diff -r 120:121 http://opensvn.csie.org/networkprogramming | wc -l 102911 $ svk mi http://opensvn.csie.org/networkprogramming //mirror/opensvn/networkprogramming $ svk sync //mirror/opensvn/networkprogramming [...] Committed revision 119 from revision 117. Committed revision 120 from revision 118. Committed revision 121 from revision 119. Committed revision 122 from revision 120. Unable to extract data from response header: Could not get content-type from response test on FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE-p8 & 6.2-PRERELEASE. svk 1.08, svn 1.4.2. -- * Gea-Suan Lin (public key: Using https://keyserver.pgp.com/ to search) * If you cannot convince them, confuse them. -- Harry S Truman _______________________________________________ svk-devel mailing list svk-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/svk-devel

Next Message by Thread: click to view message preview

2.0-releng: Windows Crash during smerge

I am having the following major issue in the 2.0-releng branch under Windows. I ran an svk smerge, suffered a crash, and during the process got this: Free to wrong pool 222bb0 not 32e7a68 at C:/Perl/site/lib/SVN/Core.pm line 417. perl -v yields: This is perl, v5.8.8 built for MSWin32-x86-multi-thread. Binary build 819 [267479] provided by ActiveState. From IRC: pjcj: smells like a core bug to do with threading, but I didn't think svk did threads -- is that right clkao? clkao: right. and your perl threadness and apache (apr actually) threadness must not hate each other. but i think everyone is using that perl on win32... pjcj: I know there's been lots of p5p talk about threads recently, and some about memory pools too, I think, but I've not really been following It leaves the mirror locked. The commit to svn from svk smerge does occur. It does the "Merge back committed as revision 1176", Syncing, Retrieving log information, Committed revision 11, and then the Free to wrong pool message The libs are the latest versions posted on subversion.tigris.org. I've done this twice now from two clean Perl installations. Most packages come from PPM, although a couple are retrieved from CPAN and built during the makefile process. Anyone have any ideas? Thanks, Josh _______________________________________________ svk-devel mailing list svk-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.bestpractical.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/svk-devel
Sign up for updates to this mailing list. email:
Loading Comments...
Home | News | Patents | Sitemap | FAQ | advertise

Advertising by