Re: Re: RevML DTD

On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 23:51, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
> Sounds like a broken validator; here's the spec:
> 
>     http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#NT-Name

Ah... I was using the wrong xml.dcl

OK, now my output matches the revml.dtd ...except that I added an
<ATTRIBUTE> element so you can see what I'm talking about.

What happened to the <MOVE> element?  How do you represent the second
file name for a rename or clone?

I've attached an example change set in RevML format.  It's a real change
set, that modifies a single file).  Please let me know all of the many
many assumptions I'm breaking.  There are a bunch of mandatory elements
that I can't work out what they are for, so they have (probably wrong)
dummy values.

I've also attached the modified DTD, so that you can diff against
revml.dtd 0.35 and see the few additions I've made, and the multitude of
questions I've added for elements.


> Also note xmllint's response:
> 
>     bash-2.05b$ echo "<_/>" | xmllint -
>     <?xml version="1.0"?>
>     <_/>
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Barrie
> 
> Peter Miller wrote:
> 
> >On Sat, 2005-01-08 at 02:18, Barrie Slaymaker wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>See this link for the latest [RevML DTD]:
> >>
> >>   http://public.perforce.com/public/revml/revml.dtd
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >I've got RevML generation working, and I've started to check the output
> >against the DTD using James Clark's nsgmls.
> >
> >It is barfing on the DTD: it says that "_" is not a valid element name
> >character.
> >
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> revml mailing list
> revml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://maillist.perforce.com/mailman/listinfo/revml
-- 
Peter Miller <millerp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

c232.revml
Description: Text document

revml.dtd
Description: Text Data

revml.entities
Description: Text document

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part