On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 07:22:05PM +0900, Jun OKAJIMA wrote:
> One idea.
> Monotone uses hash to identify a file. Rsync uses hash for the same purpose.
> By using rsync for checking in files and if rsync can pass hash values to
> monotone, there is no need to recalc hashes.
I'm afraid I don't quite understand what you mean by "using rsync for
checking in files". The only thing that monotone does that is similar
to rsync is our "netsync" protocol for transmitting changes, and
netsync is much more efficient than rsync. So I don't know why we
would want to use rsync for anything.
-- Nathaniel
--
So let us espouse a less contested notion of truth and falsehood, even
if it is philosophically debatable (if we listen to philosophers, we
must debate everything, and there would be no end to the discussion).
-- Serendipities, Umberto Eco
|
| 
