Re: current multiple heads (was Re: write access to my public server)

Derek Scherger schrieb:
> > 81e8e9daf5732466a85ea85167be3749ba3bf465 christof@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > 2004-04-21T12:36:18
> I like it!
thank you.

> > which clearly shows 1065 as the best candidate.
> not sure how clear that is... ;)
> are you looking at the most recent date?
yes I did. Even more since Diskussion on this list suggests that the 
other two are not recommended by their authors.
> Being very picky, how about a couple of small "improvements"?
> - put the date before the author so things line up nicer
> - sort it by date so the latest is last (it seems rather random at the 
> moment)
I thought that the author would be the primary criterion for choicing 
one. So I put it first.
Sorting would be a more invasive patch, so I waited for feedback first.

   Christof