David Roundy (droundy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> Well, I'm definitely learning from your discussion, so I'm not going to
> shut you up... :) I'll definitely use this as a resource if I ever
> implement more character support than I've now got. But as I mentioned
> before, that'll depend on someone really wanting to use darcs with UTF-16
> data. Its target audience is developers, and since source code tends to be
> 7 bit ASCII, 7 bit ASCII is really what I care about.
Well, I can say that I'm planning to use darcs with XML documents (English,
Croatian, Sanskrit diacritics, maybe Devanagari ..) written in utf-8 :-}
Sincerely,
Gour
--
Gour
gour@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Registered Linux User #278493
|
