Re: Repository.writePatch (issue80)

> > Total time (wall clock)
> > orig: 5 hours +
> > no-reread: 6 minutes
> 
> > Peak RES (as measured by top)
> > orig: 940MB
> > no-reread: 950MB
> 
> Am I reading this correctly?  This unoptimisation makes Darcs 50 times
> faster on large records while not using significantly more memory?

At *least* 50 times faster -- Jason killed the first experiment after he was
satisfied that it was sufficiently bad on both time and space.  :-)
 
Regards,

Zooko