> No trouble at all. Even if you were claiming it incorrect, I would not
> have taken it badly, promise :-)
Well, I dislike rejecting a patch just because I cannot convince
myself it doesn't break; I'd much rather prove it breaks. (Lack of
positive evidence is not negative evidence, as somebody once noted
about Indo-Europeans having no hands.)
> Am i? You might be thinking of a different issue, like roundup 47
No, I'm actually thinking of 29.
Juliusz
|
Try Searching:
servers, voip, java, networking, microsoft ...
|
|
|
| 
