|
|
October 27, 2005
- Making diff use checkpoints -- a proposal, Juliusz Chroboczek
- darcs patch: Include validators in slurpies. (and 1 more), Juliusz Chroboczek
- darcs patch: Remove obsolete comment., Juliusz Chroboczek
- darcs patch: Implement gitCommitDate. (and 8 more), Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: darcs patch: Implement break2PS. (and 1 more), Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [darcs #566] illegal character encoding conversion for file/directory names, David Roundy
- Re: Flattening of patches, David Roundy
- Re: darcs patch: Implement break2PS. (and 1 more), David Roundy
- darcs patch: Allow the 'summary' option to be passed to record, and..., Daniel Burrows
- darcs patch: Allow the 'summary' option to be passed to record, and..., Daniel Burrows
October 11, 2005
- build report for 1.04rc2 on FreeBSD 4.10, Mark Stosberg
- Re: darcs push method over CGI, Durand Miller
- [darcs #550] Re: Bug#333251: Doesn't like pasted text., Isaac Jones via RT
- darcs patch: avoid duplicated code for constructing patch bundles i..., David Roundy
- darcs patch: remove PatchSequence, which has long bee... (and 4 more), David Roundy
- Re: darcs push method over CGI, David Roundy
- darcs push method over CGI, Durand Miller
- [darcs #549] darcs bug, Jan Rychter via RT
- [darcs #548] Re: Bug#332542: Please reflow --help output to the terminal width, Isaac Jones via RT
- [darcs #547] Re: Bug#304264: use case, Isaac Jones via RT
October 03, 2005
- Re: [darcs #530] Should darcs pull update _darcs/defaultrepo if pull is cancelled?, Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: back from ICFP (and roadmap), Juliusz Chroboczek
- [darcs #541] darcs push: failed to read patch in get_extra: [round 2], Korusef via RT
- [darcs #542] darcs push: failed to read patch in get_extra:, Korusef via RT
- [darcs #540] [BUG] with 1.0.4pre4 extra dependencies fail in Record.lhs:413, Alexei Matveev via RT
- Re: back from ICFP (and roadmap), Yuval Kogman
- back from ICFP (and roadmap), David Roundy
- Re: [darcs #538] boringfile should be ignored if _darcs/patches is empty, David Roundy
- Re: [darcs #530] Should darcs pull update _darcs/defaultrepo if pull is cancelled?, David Roundy
- Re: [darcs #530] Should darcs pull update _darcs/defaultrepo if pull is cancelled?, Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: darcs patch: (mostly TeXnical) changes to the documentation, Stephen J. Turnbull
October 01, 2005
- Re: darcs revert remove not controlled files., zooko
- [darcs #539] ChangeLog files and darcs patches, request for special case, via RT
- [darcs #538] boringfile should be ignored if _darcs/patches is empty, via RT
- [darcs #537] darcs whatsnew should get --look-for-adds --no-summary by default, via RT
- [darcs #536] darcs changes seems to list unrecorded patches, via RT
- [darcs #535] Documentation suggestions, via RT
- [darcs #534] Darcs doesn't handle directory removal well, via RT
- [darcs #533] darcs record --ask-deps choked: pull_firsts_middles called badly, via RT
- [darcs #532] darcs record --logfile requires trailing newline in logfile, via RT
- [darcs #531] quitting from --ask-deps records the empty patch anyway, via RT
- [darcs #530] Should darcs pull update _darcs/defaultrepo if pull is cancelled?, via RT
- [darcs #529] Darcs didn't give me a second chance on a "wait" patch, via RT
- [darcs #528] grepping the manual for "bug" doesn't find RT or bugs@xxxxxxxxx, via RT
- Re: darcs patch: (mostly TeXnical) changes to the documentation, Stephen J. Turnbull
- Re: darcs revert remove not controlled files., Stephen J. Turnbull
- [darcs #527] ssh on w32 -- requires account name and report lack of it poorly, Zooko via RT
- Re: darcs patch: (mostly TeXnical) changes to the documentation, Stephen J. Turnbull
|
|