* David Roundy:
> On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 06:44:05AM -0500, Christoph Wegscheider via RT wrote:
>> Further there should be a check to avoid such email loops, as this
>> should be trivial and can prevent a lot of troubles on the user side.
>
> I suppose we'd have to include a header when we generate a reply email, and
> then check for that flag when apply receives an email? That does sound like
> a good idea.
See RFC 3834 for some recommendations:
<http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3834.txt>
Following these proposals gives you some chance that you can also
avoid darcs <--> some other responder loops, not just darcs <--> darcs
loops.
|
Try Searching:
servers, voip, java, networking, microsoft ...
|
|
|
|