Re: s390 support?

Another option might be to cross-compile with crosstool ... er,
well, it would be if crosstool had any known good glibc-2.2 s390
combinations in its build matrix:
http://kegel.com/crosstool/current/buildlogs/
Anyway, if there's interest in better s390 support in crosstool,
this could be improved.  I'm adding a little fix for Andrew Morton,
so there is at least one s390 crosstool user :-)

On 6/7/06, Larry McVoy <lm@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I know some of you use this.  We're thinking about using hercules (a
> simulator) running debian with glibc2.3 as a build machine.  The old
> images that we built were for glibc2.2 linux.
>
> So the question is do any of you actually need a glibc that old?
>
> And while I'm here if you wouldn't mind replying privately if you
> are using BitKeeper on s390/linux I could take the discussion to
> just the people who care.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> ---
> Larry McVoy                lm at bitmover.com           http://www.bitkeeper.com
> _______________________________________________
> Bitkeeper-users mailing list
> Bitkeeper-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://mail.bitmover.com/mailman/listinfo/bitkeeper-users


--
Wine for Windows ISVs: http://kegel.com/wine/isv