logo       

Re: linuxppc trees, what is going on ?: msg#00051

Subject: Re: linuxppc trees, what is going on ?
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 07:40:58AM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:43:30AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 06:30:00PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:22:51AM -0700, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > > Yeah, but the point is, i am not sure if i am the person most
> > > > > appropriate to checking which of all those changeset are needed or 
> > > > > not.
> > > > > A proper tagging would be much more appropriate, and make for easy
> > > > > reference when getting feedback and such.
> > > >
> > > > A proper tagging, for distribution use, isn't possible 100% of the time.
> > > > For example, if the tree goes from v2.4.29 to v2.4.30-pre1 to
> > > > v2.4.30-pre2 all while myself/Paul/Ben are on vacation, theres no way
> > > > to bring the bitkeeper tree, as of v2.4.30-pre1 and v2.4.30-pre2 into
> > > > linuxppc-2.4 and make a tag for each.  Likewise, if we don't grab the
> > > > bitkeeper tree at exactly v2.4.30-pre2, we can't make a tag that
> > > > corresponds to exactly that.
> > >
> > > Ohh. So this should be attributed to bitkeeper brokeness then ?
> >
> > I think it's just a design issue.  You can't export as a bitkeeper tree
> > a bitkeeper tree at a given revision because it would be too much work,
> > or something.  I don't know for certain.  Can anyone on the
> > bitkeepr-users list shed some light on why there's no 'bk export -tbk' ?
> > Or is there a functional equivalent that I don't know?
>
> I don't know what it is that you are trying to do but I can guess.
>
> Regardless, the reason there is no 'bk export -tbk' is because it is not
> a feature that most people find useful.  I suspect that this is something
> that is more interesting to the open source folks than the commercial
> folks and if that is the case it isn't going to get fixed unless
> someone convinces their management to fund the change.  We're willing
> to do just about anything you want if you can foot the engineering NRE.

It turns out I just forgot about 'bk clone -rXXXX' which, at least in
my mind is equivalent to 'bk export -tbk -rXXXX'.

--
Tom Rini
http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

Recently Viewed:
science.linguis...    culture.sf.lite...    video.mplayer.c...    yellowdog.gener...    ietf.rfc822/199...    emacs.help/2002...    redhat.release....    kernel.speakup/...    java.openejb.de...    debian.devel.gt...    xfree86.newbie/...    bug-tracking.ma...    pam/2003-05/msg...    games.devel.ope...    user-groups.lin...    music.pancham/2...    network.mq.deve...    web.html.genera...    arklinux.bugs/2...    linux.ecasound/...    qnx.openqnx.dev...    org.user-groups...    file-systems.sf...    trustix.contrib...   
Home | blog view | USPTO Patent Archive | advertise | OSDir is an inevitable website. super tiny logo

Free Magazines

Cisco News
Receive a free quarterly e-newsletter with exclusive articles on how Cisco IT uses its own products and solutions to enable the business.
subscribe

Systems Management News, the newspaper for IT systems administration and data center managers! Each issue of Systems Management News is chock-full of news and analysis to help you understand what's happening in your field.
subscribe

The Enterprise Newsweekly eWeek is the essential technology information source for builders of e-business.
subscribe

Oracle Magazine Oracle Magazine contains technology strategy articles, sample code, tips, Oracle and partner news, how to articles for developers and DBAs, and more. Oracle (NASDAQ: ORCL) is the world's largest enterprise software company.
subscribe

Total Telecom Total Telecom is "The Economist of the communications industry".
subscribe