On Fri, 2003-11-14 at 12:38, Nathan Binkert wrote:
> I thought that was true until I did a test. I did a clean clone of one
> our other repositories, and then did a simple diff between the two. There
> were many missing files in the cloned repo. The BitKeeper/deleted
> directory has a bunch of stuff in it in the root. The BitKeeper/etc and
> BitKeeper/log directories also have differences, though I guess we're
> going to lose the log dir either way. There's also a lot of p.* files in
> the cloned copy.
You can ignore all of these. The stuff in BitKeeper/deleted is still
there, just not checked out of SCCS. Many of the files in BitKeeper/etc
are temporary and per-repository files, which are deliberately never
revision controlled. The p.* files are probably not an issue, either;
they just indicate that someone has locked those files.
<b
_______________________________________________
Bitkeeper-users mailing list
Bitkeeper-users@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://bitmover.com/mailman/listinfo/bitkeeper-users
To unsubscribe from this list, go to the above URL, follow instruction at the
bottom of the web page.
|
