Re: In defense of (the idea of) having an XML-RPC : msg#01647

-->

Re: In defense of (the idea of) having an XML-RPC api: msg#01647

Subject:	Re: In defense of (the idea of) having an XML-RPC api

In my view, you're a little hung up on the "XML" portion of "XML-RPC".

Could you see any use in an RPC interface to arch archives?  I haven't yet,
but I'm not thinking very hard about the problem.


-- 
 Mark A. Flacy

"I'll sleep when I'm dead." -- Warren Zevon

Special educational offers, white papers, webcasts, podcasts

WEBCAST: Offshore software development: Making it a success with agile practices. Register Now:

WEBCAST: IBM WebSphere Portal V6.1 Web 2.0 Capabilities. Register Now:

WHITE PAPER: Best practices for software analysis (Best Practices)

DOWNLOAD NEW E-KIT: Download the IBM pureXML Developers Kit:

DOWNLOAD: Rational Trial Software – Rational Team Concert Free Information:

TUTORIAL: Debug iPhone Web applications with Eclipse

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:	Re: In defense of (the idea of) having an XML-RPC api, Scott Parish
Next by Date:	Re: In defense of (the idea of) having an XML-RPC api, Tom Lord
Previous by Thread:	Re: In defense of (the idea of) having an XML-RPC api, Tom Lord
Next by Thread:	Re: In defense of (the idea of) having an XML-RPC api, Tom Lord
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

^^^ ADDITIONAL NAVIGATION ^^^

Recently Viewed:
mail.spam.rbl.s... php.seagull.gen... culture.religio... qnx.openqnx.dev... gnome.love/2006... bug-tracking.re... user-groups.lin... yellowdog.gener... handhelds.ipaq.... kde.announce/20... java.mx4j.devel... xfree86.expert/... recreation.cars... text.xml.expat.... web.zope.zope3/... version-control... db.carob.cvs/20... freebsd.perform... ecos.cvs/2003-0... linux.hotplug.d... systemtap/2006-... os.freebsd.secu...

Home | blog view | USPTO Patent Archive (NEW!) | advertise | OSDir is an inevitable website. super tiny logo