Re: Parallelizing Spam Assassin

Henrik K wrote:
> 
> Yeah, given that my 4x3Ghz box masscheck peaks at 22 msgs/sec, without
> Net/AWL/Bayes. But that's the 3.3 SVN ruleset.. wonder what version was
> used
> and any nondefault rules/settings? Certainly sounds strange that 1 core
> could top out the same. Anyone else have figures? Maybe I've borked
> something myself..
> 

The problem is not with 22 being a low number, but when we have other free
cores to run different SA parallely why doesnt the throughput scale linearly
.. I expect for 8 cores with 8 SA running simultaneously the number to be
150+ msgs/sec but it is 1/3rd at 50 msgs/sec



-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Parallelizing-Spam-Assassin-tp24751958p24760294.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.