Re: Problem with whitelist_from_rcvd and forged reverse lookup

> On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 16:46 +0200, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> > * Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx> [2009-07-30 16:35]:
> > > On 30.07.09 14:03, Sebastian Wiesinger wrote:
> 
> > > > I was under the impression that whitelist_from_rcvd checks if the
> > > > reverse lookup is forged. But still with the following rule

On 30.07.09 21:06, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> SA does not do the DNS lookup, but depends on the MTA doing so and
> recording the result in the Received header.

the MTA (sendmail?) did put a "may be forged" into Received: line, In which
case SA shouldl ignore the hostname.

Now the question is, if it does, and the reported X-Spam headers indicates it
does not, which is a bug then.

-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
"The box said 'Requires Windows 95 or better', so I bought a Macintosh".