Re: Number of rules

On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 03:55:48 +0200
Karsten Bräckelmann <guenther@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


> The default of 0.1. It's a default for a reason.
> 
> But that *really* is not your problem. Your problem is with learning
> spam, not learning even more ham. Just as you mentioned in your
> original report. See my previous response for a solution. You want to
> learn more spam.

What he actually wrote was that 3.7% of _all_messages_ were hitting
hitting BAYES_00, and 1.7% were hitting BAYES_99.

If he actually meant what he wrote and doesn't have an extraordinary
spam/ham ratio, then he clearly has a problem with both spam and
ham.