|
Re: Spam and double-bounces: msg#00865user-groups.linux.kansascity
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 08:37:20PM -0600, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > - Are there any nasty side-effects of simply dropping double-bounce > reports? I really don't want to wade through them all if I don't have to. My theory is that this is a nasty side effect of accepting mail that you didn't intend to deliver. It's a result of not having any system-wide spam filtering that you inted to do as close to the beginning as possible. Rejecting it before it's accepted is more appropriate, but we don't always do the most appropriate thing. If neither the sender or receiver want it, /dev/null it. Don't ever look back. This is not a universally held belief, but it's my current belief. $0.02 -Andy KC Linux Users Group -- to unsubscribe send mail to majordomo-3DadQFcgQnvYtjvyW6yDsg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Enter without the quotes in body of message "unsubscribe kclug" |
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | via kt600 based motherboard compatibility: 00865, Hanasaki JiJi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Jobs: 00865, admin-QC7ZmcCSQ9jR7s880joybQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Previous by Thread: | Spam and double-bouncesi: 00865, Charles Steinkuehler |
| Next by Thread: | via kt600 based motherboard compatibility: 00865, Hanasaki JiJi |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |