|
Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender: msg#00324user-groups.linux.ilug.general
Quoting Liam Bedford (lbedford@xxxxxxxxxxxx): > Cheers Rick.. didn't we have a big discussion about the uselessness > of replying to viruses? > > And you could at least add some clue to the script to check X-Mailer: > so that it doesn't tell someone who isn't using outlook to stop using > outlook. > > oh, and it's a headache, not a headacke Good grief, were you _actually_ fooled by some piece of malware's forged headers? Would you please learn to analyse Received headers in the future? Thanks. (Why the _hell_ would my site "reject executable attachments"? Clue: It doesn't.) -- Cheers, The cynics among us might say: "We laugh, Rick Moen monkeyboys -- Linux IS the mainstream UNIX now! rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx MuaHaHaHa!" but that would be rude. -- Jim Dennis -- Irish Linux Users' Group http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug/
|
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| Previous by Date: | Software Freedom Day 2004, SFD Team |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender, Mail Delivery System |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender, Liam Bedford |
| Next by Thread: | Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender, Mail Delivery System |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
| News | FAQ | advertise |