logo       

Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender: msg#00324

user-groups.linux.ilug.general

Subject: Re: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

Quoting Liam Bedford (lbedford@xxxxxxxxxxxx):

> Cheers Rick.. didn't we have a big discussion about the uselessness
> of replying to viruses?
>
> And you could at least add some clue to the script to check X-Mailer:
> so that it doesn't tell someone who isn't using outlook to stop using
> outlook.
>
> oh, and it's a headache, not a headacke

Good grief, were you _actually_ fooled by some piece of malware's forged
headers? Would you please learn to analyse Received headers in the
future? Thanks.

(Why the _hell_ would my site "reject executable attachments"? Clue:
It doesn't.)

--
Cheers, The cynics among us might say: "We laugh,
Rick Moen monkeyboys -- Linux IS the mainstream UNIX now!
rick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx MuaHaHaHa!" but that would be rude. -- Jim Dennis
--
Irish Linux Users' Group
http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug/




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Google Custom Search

News | FAQ | advertise