On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 22:52:11 -0700, Daniel Gimpelevich wrote:
> No, it most certainly is not. That repository is for Debian, not Ubuntu,
> as it is not consistent with Ubuntu's differing dependency and repository
> structure. The sources.list I prepared should take care of anything that
> repository provides, at least on i386. On powerpc and amd64, "sudo apt-get
> -b source foo" is your friend.
Oops, my bad. That should say "fakeroot" instead of "sudo" there. Also,
don't forget to prefix it with "sudo apt-get build-dep foo" to prevent
confusing errors.
|
