:-(
Le 10/3/2005, "Robin Sonefors" <ozamosi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit:
>
>Actually, you are not allowed to ship GPL:ed code together with BSD-code. They
>aren't compatible with each other. If one use the Linux-kernel, the user would
>have to fetch that themselves.
>
>Begin forwarded message:
>
>Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 12:33:19 -0500 (EST)
>From: "Jacques Mony" <jmony@xxxxxxxxx>
>To: uuu-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [Uuu-devel] Re: Persistence, UI, etc.
>
>
>
>I don't think license is a problem. GPL code is free to distribute if
>you ship the source code along... which we do anyways. The problem might
>be when people will want to distribute an improved uuu with
>closed-source compoenents... but a BSD kernel could be a nice
>solution... even if I know nothing about them.
>
>Le 10/3/2005, "Jasper Lievisse Adriaanse" <jasper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>a écrit:
>
>> >It lacks persistence and its new UI. But we have bigger problems,
>>
>> >especially on the stability side. OSKit doesn't seem to be a very good
>>
>> >friend. So we do investigate new avenues. Here are some:
>>
>> >
>> > - Building uuu over a microkernel (L4 for one)
>>
>> > - Building uuu over Linux kernel (not over a Linux distribution, make
>>
>> >sure to understand the difference)
>>
>> > - Get OSKit out of there and start from scratch with few device drivers.
>>
>> >
>> > On the Linux front, I found LPSM (http://freshmeat.net/projects/lpsm/),
>>
>> >which allows to implement memory persistence. It's old, in early alpha
>>
>> >stages and abandoned as I can understand. But it could be interesting to
>>
>> >test it. Maybe I'm wrong, but if we can build our core with LPSM as the
>>
>> >python interpreter memory management library, we could turn it very
>>
>> >quickly into a persistent memory environment. We could then take the
>>
>> >development of LPSM as part of our efforts (it's LGPL anyways).
>>
>>I am a quite a Unix-lover and I have tested quite some Unices. But I
>>think, from the perspective of usability and performance, it's best to
>>either build UUU over L4 or Mach, or build UUU over the Linux kernel.
>>But if you use the Linux kernel I'm not very sure whether it'll work
>>with licenses and such, since some UUU-code is BSD-licensed. So if the
>>license is and issue, build UUU over the 4.4 BSD kernel. It's reliable,
>>stable and rocks like no other kernel.
>>
>>But that's just me talking... ;-)
>>
>>Jasper
>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Uuu-devel mailing list
>Uuu-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://unununium.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/uuu-devel
>
>
>
|
