On Fri, Oct 24, 2003 at 06:50:30PM +0200, Rene Caspari wrote:
> > I've never used IPSec but it's just a higher level protocol, there should be
> > no problem transporting it over tun or a bridge. The higest protocol a
> > bridge is aware of is ARP at layer 2.
> Thats right, because of this i don't understand, why it shouldn't work.
I'm *using* IPSec from UML machine to real IPSec gateway and both
implementations (freeswan and new backport from 2.6 series) works.
Should I say that they work in tests within multiple VM (UML)
instances.
I'm using tuntap to connect form VM (UML) to real IPSec gateway and
it works. Freeswan works without problem. New (2.6 backport) sometimes
freezes but it is "work in progress" anyway.
So, it should work.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The SF.net Donation Program.
Do you like what SourceForge.net is doing for the Open
Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new
features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
|
