Hi,
for testing with freeswan i have installed 4 UML-machines with following
configuration:
+-----------------------------+ +-----------------------------+
|eth0 192.168.150.43 (tuntap)-----eth0 192.168.150.45 (tuntap) |
| | | |
+--eth1 192.168.140.254 (mcast) | | (mcast) 192.168.130.254 eth1--+
| +-----------------------------+ +-----------------------------+ |
| |
| +--------------------------+ +--------------------------+ |
+--eth0 192.168.140.1 (mcast)| |192.168.130.1 (mcast) eth0--+
+--------------------------+ +--------------------------+
Now i want to reach 192.168.130.1 from 192.168.140.1
(by ping for example).
Freeswan seems to be configured correctly, ipsec whack --status shows:
...
000 "vpc45-vpc43":
192.168.140.0/24===192.168.150.45...192.168.150.43===192.1
...
(on 192.168.150.43 and 192.168.150.45 too)
If i start to ping 192.168.130.1 from 192.168.140.1, no reply comes
back.
If i look with tcpdump on the special interfaces, i see, that the
icmp-request reaches 192.168.130.1 - but no reply is generated.
Are there any errors in my construction?
Or can Freeswan/IPSec don't be handled with UML, especially mcast and
tuntap in this case?
bye, rene
--
| Chemnitzer Linuxtag 2004 - http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/linux/tag |
| - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
| >> Whitelist your EMail-Adress: http://www.ahrcas.net/mail-auth |
| Rene Caspari - rene@xxxxxxxxxx - GnuPG-ID: CA40A793 |
pgp8Jx3xxtbsB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|
