On 11/23/05, John Dong <jdong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Only if the maintainer did choose using a 'patch'-system like dpatch
> > or dbs. Thats no requisite, because all patches go to the .diff.gz
> > anyway. What do you do in this case?
>
> If it's not patch-system'ed, then forget it. I'm not murking around
> debdiffs, and I'm sure you guys don't want me to be!
If you'd ask what we would want, then I'll happily invite you to get
some experience in dapper/universe, and become a regular ubuntu
developer like every other MOTU :). It's really not that hard, and its
really fun ;). The experience from that will surely help you in making
right decisions on difficult backports, and help you understanding
decisions in the release process.
PS: When posting emails, please delete parts you don't reference for
easier reading of your answers.
--
regards,
Reinhard
--
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
|
