-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 30 Aug 2003 12:34 am, Robert Eden wrote:
>
> Yes, my company owns the license, and I see nothing illegal in it. I
> "compile" it on my company's laptop, so I have not installed it on
> another system.
>
> My company has no problem with me doing open source stuff. I've even
> published some stuff on CPAN created for the company on company time
> with their blessing.
I wasn't suggesting that the issue would be with the company you work for,
rather the company that sold you the licence for the compiler.
I work for a company that releases tools, including compilers. If we sell a
compiler licence to somebody we expect them to use the compiler for their
work and their releases. We don't expect them to let other people use it for
other work. Your company bought the licence, and xmltv isn't part of your
company's work, and so if we had sold you the compiler licence we'd be
expecting you to buy another licence, or taking you to court.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/UAWpBGGH+7lrhRgRAiZXAKCnRfjSc/VSkaFi9NiBKXuhBKAI5gCfdLOy
DUsCk1Qu2PHU+bTiadkR6Ro=
=cNB4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
|
